climateexperiment.com
  • Email
  • Paypal
  • Vimeo
  • Home
  • Start Here
    • What This Website is All About
    • Risk
  • Climate
    • Climate Destabilisation – Level 1
    • Climate Destabilisation – Level 2
    • Climate Destabilisation – Level 3
    • Climate Destabilisation – Level 4
  • Peak Oil
    • Peak Oil – Level 1
    • Peak Oil – Level 2
    • Peak Oil – Level 3
    • Peak Oil – Level 4
  • Debt Crisis
    • Debt Crisis – Level 1
    • Debt Crisis – Level 2
    • Debt Crisis – Level 3
    • Debt Crisis – Level 4
  • My Work
    • Peak Oil Files
      • Chapter 1
      • Chapter 2
      • Chapter 3
      • Chapter 4
      • Chapter 5
    • Showcase
  • The Blog
  • About
    • About Me
    • About the Website
    • About The Videos
Search the site...

What the Green Movement Got Wrong

Posted by Matt Beer - November 15, 2011 - Climate Destabilisation, Climate Level 4, Energy, Level 4, Nuclear, Renewables
0

This hour long Channel 4 “documentary” contends that some of the positions that the green movement has taken in the past, particularly on nuclear power and genetically modified foods has been wrong and has actually not helped the general aims of the movement get where it wants to go. It suggests that parts of the green movement is now trapped in an ideological corner and needs to reconsider it’s position on these key issues.

The follow up discussion on the Channel 4 (UK) youtube channel will help put some of the points made in the doco into perspective although it highlights that there still isn’t a consensus view on much in the green movement still. But I suppose with such a big subject and with so much at stake it will be almost impossible to take the human emotion out of the debate. Passionate people can be a help and also a hinderance.

The reason why i put documentary in quotation marks is that this video is more of an opinion piece than a real documentary. I in fact agree with a fair chunk of what stance the doco made (nuclear is the lesser evil and I am ambivalent about GM) but as the debate after the show highlights, the complexity of the issues involved cannot be simplified into a 60 minute video. Also you cannot label the green movement with a single brush. Just as with the Occupy Wall St movement, it captures a broad cross section of people who all involved for very different reasons and want many different things.

But it does raise the question of what is going wrong and why the most consequential issue on the planet right now is fading from the political landscape. Not having a consensus on issues such as nuclear cannot help the fact that the issue of climate change is not resonating with people at the moment.

Climate Change, Climate Destabilisation, environment, Nuclear

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

3,264 Spam Comments Blocked so far by Spam Free Wordpress

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Tags

Bailout Biofuels China Climate Change Climate Destabilisation Climate Science Conventional oil Credit rating Crude Oil Debt Economics Economy environment EROEI fossil fuel Gasoline GDP Geo-politics Global Warming Greed Growth Hahaha - that's funny Inflation media Money Natural Gas Oil Oil Production OPEC Peak Oil Peer Reviewed Petrol population Quantitative Easing Renewables Stagflation Stanford University steady growth sustainability Transport Trillion Unconventional Gas Unconventional Oil United States Video

Recent Posts

  • The Carbon Cycle – WMO
  • Vox – It’s not about saving the planet.
  • The Modern Food System
  • Weather vs Climate – Neil deGrasse Tyson
  • Jeremy Rifkin: “The Zero Marginal Cost Society”
2012 climateexperiment.com - Web Design by Jason Bobich